Public Accounts Conditioning

Although yesterday’s PAC was quite amusing, I’m not sure exactly how valuable a couple of hours was spent watching it.

I don’t think anything that came from any of the witnesses was particularly shocking. I think Matt Brittin put in the performance of the day. Andrew Cecil must come a close second, though for entirely different reasons.

One thing I appreciated was that when they were discussing the decision to structure Google’s business in Ireland, Brittin made no disguise of the fact that the corporation tax rate was a consideration.

As a tax adviser, I find the idea that the PAC seemed to be labouring under, that businesses don’t consider the tax rates as a decision in structuring absurd. It’s one of many considerations (as Brittin explained) and MPs moralising over this fact is fairly dishonest, in my opinion.

Tax is often used as a mechanism for encouraging certain behaviours, and politicians certainly enjoy playing with the levers. It’s no surprise that the small reliefs given are optimistically viewed as having more behavioural impact than the revenue raising measures.

But you don’t sever that link just because you didn’t intend it that way. Probably, the reliefs and allowances you give away encourage the mindset, that the rules are there to provide decisions with differing outcomes that you are eligible to pick from. In Pavlovian fashion, there is a reward for picking the ‘right’ one. Or rather, there is less penalty.

Maybe business representatives being hauled before Parliament is just another attempt at conditioning.

About Ben Saunders

I'm a Chartered Tax Adviser and a freelance writer. This is my personal blog about, well, mainly taxation. I might put other stuff in. Who knows.
This entry was posted in Ranting, Starbucks, Talking Tax and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Public Accounts Conditioning

  1. “MPs moralising over this fact is fairly dishonest”

    Fairly dishonest! That’s an understatement. In my opinion, it is naivety bordering on simple stupidity.

    I think the MPs were lucky that Amazon chose to send Andrew Cecil along, he provided a convenient distraction from their shameful posturing and lack of understanding of global commerce.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s