Proof that Starbucks were profitable for tax purposes

Proof that Starbucks were profitable for tax purposes

As you can see from the above, the accounts show a loss. However, from the losses utilised and the tax charge, we can calculate what taxable profits were.

This is calculated as (utilised losses + tax charge) / 30% (the rate of tax).

This gives taxable profits of £12.8m for 2006 and £19.8m for 2007.

You can see that the UK accounting profits are not representative of UK taxable profits. This reconciliation note explains why. There are significant adjustments in relation to depreciation and disallowable expenses (royalties perchance?).

If Starbucks had continued to produce results at the level of 2007, they would have paid tax in the region of £6m a year.

These accounting periods coincide with the use of the word “profitable” which Thomson Reuters drew attention to in their original report.

There is no suggestion that they said the UK was profitable throughout the 12 year period of losses in the UK.

This shows that even though UK accounts show a loss, Starbucks were making taxable profits in the UK at the time they were described as profitable.

About Ben Saunders

I'm a Chartered Tax Adviser and a freelance writer. This is my personal blog about, well, mainly taxation. I might put other stuff in. Who knows.
Image | This entry was posted in Starbucks, Talking Tax, Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Proof that Starbucks were profitable for tax purposes

  1. Pingback: Starbucks, and Chris Lenon’s new blog « Martin Hearson

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s