How to improve your Fair Tax Mark by abusing the tax system

I didn’t realise this the other day, but the example I produced shows something quite amusing.

FTM dt

 

The Fair Tax Mark campaign argues that disregarding deferred tax is necessary on account of some businesses unfairly deferring tax liabilities this way. So all businesses deferring tax liabilities are treated the same, regardless of the abusiveness of their behaviour.

But, back to the amusing part: this straightforward example also shows that a business can actually improve its score by deferring a tax liability.

£15m is not paid in year 1 and is paid in five instalments over years 2 to 6. By deferring the tax liability, the weighted difference suggests that this company has paid more than a fair rate (difference being “expected less actual”).

This is true even if the capital allowances arise as the result of an abusive scheme. 

The explanation for this is obvious: the arbitrary annual weighting distorts the reversal in years 2 to 6. The reversal comes back with greater relevance than the origination in year 1.

Advertisements

About Ben Saunders

I'm a Chartered Tax Adviser and a freelance writer. This is my personal blog about, well, mainly taxation. I might put other stuff in. Who knows.
This entry was posted in Fair Tax Mark. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s